"I think the regulations cite that the reduction-in-force plans need to be clear and specific because employees can challenge those," said Michael Fallings.

I address two topics today: an important U.S. Supreme Court decision and a Trump Administration directive. The recent Supreme ...

In a sweeping rebuke, a court ruled that NIH’s actions targeting research involving "disfavored" topics and populations were ...

On Monday, some employees at ORD, the largest office in the agency, began receiving emails saying they’d been assigned new ...

In the last month, we have gained additional insight into the future of the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) ...

Federal judges have accused the Trump administration of resisting court orders in approximately 34 percent of cases ...

The Supreme Court’s Republican majority just authorized Donald Trump’s complete dismantling of the US Department of Education ...

The Environmental Protection Agency said Friday it is eliminating its research and development arm and reducing agency staff ...

The ruling’s scope is limited to two American activists, but it represents a striking, if tentative, blow to the president’s ...

A U.S. civil service board judge has ruled that hundreds of U.S. Department of Interior employees who were fired and then ...

Federal agencies under the Trump administration must provide sealed copies of their reduction in force plans to a California ...