As more agency layoffs appear imminent, an appeals court has intervened in allowing more details on the plans to be released.

"I think the regulations cite that the reduction-in-force plans need to be clear and specific because employees can challenge those," said Michael Fallings.

Officials said the list of 40 planned RIFs was only an "estimate," and that it was both "under-inclusive and over-inclusive" of agencies' true RIF plans.

SCOTUS lifts a key injunction, enabling sweeping federal layoffs that may reshape the public sector workforce.

The Trump administration revealed to a federal court on Thursday the specific offices at which widespread layoffs were ...

The Supreme Court on Monday granted the Trump administration’s request to temporarily pause an order by a federal judge in ...

The ruling represents additional evidence of the Roberts Court's inexorable move towards a unitary theory of the executive ...

The union representing Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in their suit against mass firings at the agency said the Supreme Court's ruling allowing President Trump to proceed with mass reductions-in ...

SCOTUS allowed President Trump’s federal workforce cuts to proceed temporarily, pausing a lower court block while legal ...

To cover the Supreme Court these days is to catalogue its lawlessness. The conservative justices’ latest decision in McMahon ...

Thousands of employees across US federal health agencies received an email Monday afternoon telling them they were out of a ...

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused her colleagues of letting Trump take a "wrecking ball" to the federal government.