"I think the regulations cite that the reduction-in-force plans need to be clear and specific because employees can challenge those," said Michael Fallings.

I address two topics today: an important U.S. Supreme Court decision and a Trump Administration directive. The recent Supreme ...

What order? Trump team ignoring 1 in 3 major judicial rulings against them, analysis finds - Federal judges have accused the ...

The Supreme Court’s Republican majority just authorized Donald Trump’s complete dismantling of the US Department of Education ...

The Environmental Protection Agency said Friday it is eliminating its research and development arm and reducing agency staff ...

Interviews with more than 60 people detail a frenetic, arbitrary process underpinning the Trump administration’s far-reaching ...

Federal agencies under the Trump administration must provide sealed copies of their reduction in force plans to a California ...

The Supreme Court is letting federal RIFs continue, reversing a pause from a lower court. But it left open the door for an ...

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) staffers who received reduction in force (RIF) notices months ago were informed Monday that they were officially separated from the department after ...

In an email Monday, a few dozen National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences workers in Durham were told they would ...

A Supreme Court decision giving the Trump administration the greenlight to lay off tens of thousands of employees threatens ...