News
While the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority is pushing the law rightward, the justices appointed by GOP presidents ...
1don MSN
Still pending before the Supreme Court this week is an appeal from Trump's lawyers that seeks the firing of three Democratic appointees to the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
2dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNThe Supreme Court Says Laws Aren’t RealTo cover the Supreme Court these days is to catalogue its lawlessness. The conservative justices’ latest decision in McMahon ...
When the Supreme Court overturns rulings without offering any explanation, it is simply wielding raw power. And raw power ...
3dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNThe Supreme Court’s Most Worrisome Non-DecisionThe Roberts Court has asked for reargument in a key redistricting case, a move that strongly suggests the conservative ...
1don MSNOpinion
By a two-to-one margin, the public believes justices prioritize politics over the law. That's a disaster for the Supreme ...
In their decision allowing the Trump administration to dismantle the Department of Education, the justices didn’t offer one ...
3dOpinion
New York Magazine on MSNSupreme Court Helps Trump Dismantle the Education DepartmentIn yet another unsigned ruling, the conservative majority treated a department closure like it’s just some minor layoffs.
The former dean of Harvard Law School emerges as more likely than her liberal colleagues to make common cause with ...
In response, several parents sued, arguing that exposing their children to the books threatened their right to raise their children according to their faith.
In a precedent-based legal system, you can’t know what the law is if you don’t have judicial opinions explaining why the courts have reached their conclusions.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results