Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit in.

Could artificial intelligence be the future of more reliable open-source encyclopedias like Wikipedia? A recent study in Nature Machine Intelligence suggests it might just be the answer. Researchers ...

An experiment adding AI-generated summaries to the top of Wikipedia pages has been paused, following fierce backlash from its community editors. The Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit behind ...

But Wikipedia's history with AI tools and other bots dates to 2002, and the foundation launched a team focused on machine learning about six years ago.

Despite the rise of such AI models as ChatGPT and Google Gemini, “old-school” Wikipedia remains one of the most visited sites around the world—with 15 billion visitors every month.

A study reveals how AI chatbots like ChatGPT are reshaping human communication patterns and introducing new linguistic traits ...

Before generative AI, if you wanted an inexpensive way to build out lots of content, you launched a wiki.You’d spin up a site—broad or niche—and throw the doors open for anyone to edit. Be ...

An experiment adding AI-generated summaries to the top of Wikipedia pages has been paused, following fierce backlash from its community editors. The Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit behind ...